Don't Miss Hillsdale College Free Lesson on our Constitution. This town hall will discuss how those principles have been undermined, and how they can be recovered.”

By: Paul Quincy






Did you say free? Yes, I said free. Hillsdale College is a great higher education facility. Four out of Five Students each year graduate with a 4.0 avg. That is 80%. Yes, you heard me right, 80%. It is one of our higher educational facilities that understand the rights of the American people and how slowly they are being taken away. One of the few higher educational facilities that are far from left. Great people come from this school with 4.0 avgs. The students do not get that grade for being far left or far right. It is from being well educated on our basic conservative standards and rights.



On January 30, 2010 this once in a lifetime experience will come your way!!!!! I urge you as fellow Americans not to miss out on this event. This seminar will be a hosted online, teaching all WE THE PEOPLE what we should know and learn about our Constitutional Rights as Americans.



These students of Hillsdale College pay big bucks for their learning. Now YOU have that same chance to learn about our Constitution for free. Understand how our rights are being violated and taking away to move this country to a socialist one.



You will be able to understand what this crazy, unable to touch the American People Congress has been doing.



Go to: www.hillsdaletownhall.com and register to be in this spectacular event. Don’t miss out. Rush Limbaugh recommends it highly too.
 
 
Below is more informaton;

Hillsdale College to Host Constitution Town Hall

Hillsdale College’s Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship, located in Washington D.C., will host “Reviving The Constitution,” a Constitution Town Hall, in Chantilly, Virginia, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. EST on January 30, 2010. The event will also be available online.

“At a time when the Constitution is largely ignored in Washington, it is vital for citizens to remember its enduring principles,” said Hillsdale College President Dr. Larry P. Arnn. “This town hall will discuss how those principles have been undermined, and how they can be recovered.”



The town hall will consist of a panel of constitutional scholars making brief presentations, followed by questions from both present and online participants. Topics to be covered include:



• The Declaration of Independence and the Principles of Free Government

• The American Constitution

• The Constitution and the Civil War

• The Progressive Attack on the Constitution

• American Government Today and What Citizens Can Do to Revive the Constitution



“The Constitution is not just the domain of judges and lawyers,” said Kirby Center Director Dr. David J. Bobb. “It is the responsibility of all Americans to understand and uphold it, and our aim with this town hall is to help equip citizens to do so.”



This event is open to the media. Further information and registration instructions can be found at constitutiontownhall.com.



Hillsdale College Town Hall Meeting

Saturday, January 30, 2010

9 a.m. - 3 p.m. EST

TV Worldwide Studios

4206-F Technology Court

Chantilly, VA 20151



Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 and has built a national reputation through its maintenance of a classical core curriculum and its principled refusal to accept any federal or state taxpayer subsidies. It also conducts a large outreach effort that promotes civil and religious liberty, including a monthly speech digest, Imprimis, with a current circulation of 1.8 million.



MEDIA CONTACT: Joseph Cella

703-286-9677

jcella@hillsdale.edu

Martin Luther KIng a Republican?

By: Paul Quincy

Martin Luther King, Jr, his father and grandfather were all Republicans.  That's right, Republicans. It was not until he was jailed as stated in the bio of this great man below,  that his wife Corretta King struck a deal with the Kennedy's in order for them to gain more black support to win in thier campaigns.  Mrs. King wanted her husband released from jail and that the Civil Rights Act be put into law.  It was not until Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, accepted this to be released from jail that he became a "de-facto" Democrate, but still held Republican views.  This may surprise a lot of you but it is the truth.  Listed below is his bio: Take time to read and celebrate the vision this man had.

Martin Luther King, Jr., (January 15, 1929-April 4, 1968) was born Michael Luther King, Jr., but later had his name changed to Martin. His grandfather began the family's long tenure as pastors of the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, serving from 1914 to 1931; his father has served from then until the present, and from 1960 until his death Martin Luther acted as co-pastor. Martin Luther attended segregated public schools in Georgia, graduating from high school at the age of fifteen; he received the B. A. degree in 1948 from Morehouse College, a distinguished Negro institution of Atlanta from which both his father and grandfather had graduated. After three years of theological study at Crozer Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania where he was elected president of a predominantly white senior class, he was awarded the B.D. in 1951. With a fellowship won at Crozer, he enrolled in graduate studies at Boston University, completing his residence for the doctorate in 1953 and receiving the degree in 1955. In Boston he met and married Coretta Scott, a young woman of uncommon intellectual and artistic attainments. Two sons and two daughters were born into the family.


In 1954, Martin Luther King became pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama. Always a strong worker for civil rights for members of his race, King was, by this time, a member of the executive committee of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the leading organization of its kind in the nation. He was ready, then, early in December, 1955, to accept the leadership of the first great Negro nonviolent demonstration of contemporary times in the United States, the bus boycott described by Gunnar Jahn in his presentation speech in honor of the laureate. The boycott lasted 382 days. On December 21, 1956, after the Supreme Court of the United States had declared unconstitutional the laws requiring segregation on buses, Negroes and whites rode the buses as equals. During these days of boycott, King was arrested, his home was bombed, he was subjected to personal abuse, but at the same time he emerged as a Negro leader of the first rank.

In 1957 he was elected president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, an organization formed to provide new leadership for the now burgeoning civil rights movement. The ideals for this organization he took from Christianity; its operational techniques from Gandhi. In the eleven-year period between 1957 and 1968, King traveled over six million miles and spoke over twenty-five hundred times, appearing wherever there was injustice, protest, and action; and meanwhile he wrote five books as well as numerous articles. In these years, he led a massive protest in Birmingham, Alabama, that caught the attention of the entire world, providing what he called a coalition of conscience. and inspiring his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail", a manifesto of the Negro revolution; he planned the drives in Alabama for the registration of Negroes as voters; he directed the peaceful march on Washington, D.C., of 250,000 people to whom he delivered his address, "l Have a Dream", he conferred with President John F. Kennedy and campaigned for President Lyndon B. Johnson; he was arrested upwards of twenty times and assaulted at least four times; he was awarded five honorary degrees; was named Man of the Year by Time magazine in 1963; and became not only the symbolic leader of American blacks but also a world figure.

At the age of thirty-five, Martin Luther King, Jr., was the youngest man to have received the Nobel Peace Prize. When notified of his selection, he announced that he would turn over the prize money of $54,123 to the furtherance of the civil rights movement.

On the evening of April 4, 1968, while standing on the balcony of his motel room in Memphis, Tennessee, where he was to lead a protest march in sympathy with striking garbage workers of that city, he was assassinated.

Fort Hood and Political Correctness, Radical Terrorist Should Be Called Out Without Fear From Thier Superiors

By: Paul Quincy

In an interview published on Al Jazeera's Web site, radical Muslim cleric Anwar al Awlaki says that Maj. Nidal Hasan, charged with killing 13 in last month's Fort Hood massacre, asked for guidance about killing American military personnel in his very first e-mail.

Awlaki claims that Hasan initiated the e-mail correspondence with a message on Dec. 17, 2008. "He was asking about killing U.S. soldiers and officers," says Awlaki. "His question was is it legitimate [under Islamic law]."

The Al Jazeera questioner asks for confirmation that Hasan forwarded this query nearly a year before the shooting

Yes," responds Awlaki. "I am astonished. Where was American intelligence that claimed once that it can read any car plate number anywhere in the world?"

Today, January 17, 2010, Congressman, John Carter from Texas on Fox News informed us that he was unhappy with the the report that came from the Pentagon.

An independant report from the Chief of Navel Operations states that there is something obvisiously wrong in the report from the Pentagon when two important words are left out.  "Radicial Islamic." 

Congressman John Carter (R) states that this report shows that Political Correctness has gone to far. 
He also stated that thier should be a whistlerblower act to cover our soldiers.  He is correct.  The fear of being court marshalled, punished or not being promoted due to Polictial Correctness runs amuk in the military. 

The Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates only did a 50 page report! Although it may be somewhat accurate the two little words Radical Islamic" was not mentioned at all. 

If someone regardless of race, or religion starts showing signs in our military of being a radical and go unreported due to be called a racist, then we are in sorry shape.

This is just another sign of how our Administration does not take terrorism seriously.  Wake up America.  We the People want to be protected.  Our government has failed us with this issue.  We can not shake and bow and kiss the rings of Leaders around the world who hate us.  When will this Admisitration wake up and smell the coffee?  They are completely out of touch with We the People.

Do You Want a Person Who Allows Child Molesters Go and State There Are No Terrorist?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXEXkUHN-w0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esYSKv0gcz8

By: Paul Quincy






Massachusetts is two days away from either stunning the country with one of the biggest upsets in political history or electing the presumed Democratic successor to the late Edward Kennedy's long-held seat in the U.S. Senate.

The sudden ascent of Republican state Sen. Scott Brown in the polls has thrust the Senate race into the national spotlight due to its potential impact on the national health care legislation pending in Congress and for what a Republican victory in such an overwhelmingly liberal state could portend for Congressional Democrats at the start of a midterm election year

It seems that Martha Coakley covered for the brutal rape of a 23 month old baby, a toddler, with a hot curling iron. The Massachusetts police officer, Keith Winfield, allegedly had an ally to help cover up this heinous crime, Martha Coakley. If Coakley would not act in the best interest of the public on such a crucial issue because she owes political favors, she has failed. Shouldn't Coakley be voted against, and shouldn't Coakley be criminally prosecuted for acting in a conspiracy to try and cover up felonies?

I don't know anything about Coakley's rival in the special Massachusetts election, Jan. 19, 2010, for US Senator, Scott Brown. So, I don't think it should be a question of Republican or Democrat rhetoric, it should be about not knowingly electing a publicly corrupt official. I am asking Massachusetts voters to vote for Scott Brown, a vote against Martha Coakley.

Eric Holder Dismisses the Black Panther Party from Voter's Intimidation Suit

By Paul Quincy

This article first will explain what the Black Panther Party Stands for.  It is documented below.  Then we will get into the dicussion about how Eric Holder dismisses the criminal complaint against the Black Panthers, who on November 4, 2008, in Philidelphia intimated voters.

The Black Panther: [off-site link] Articles from 1968-69

In October of 1967, the police arrest the Defense Minister of the Panthers, Huey Newton, for killing an Oakland cop. Panther Eldridge Cleaver begins the movement to "Free Huey", a struggle the Panthers would devote a great deal of their attention to in the coming years, while the party spreads its roots further into the political spectrum, forming coalitions with various revolutionary parties. Stokely Carmichael,

the former chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and a nationally known proponent of Black Power, is recruited into the party through this struggle, and soon becomes the party's Prime Minister in February, 1968. Carmichael is adamantly against allowing whites into the black liberation movement, explaining whites cannot relate to the black experience and have an intimidating effect on blacks; a position that stirs opposition within the Panthers. Carmichael explains: "Whites who come into the black community with ideas of change seem to want to absolve the power structure of its responsibility for what it is doing, and say that change can only come through black unity, which is the worst kind of paternalism..... If we are to proceed toward true liberation, we must cut ourselves off from white people..... [otherwise] we will find ourselves entwined in the tentacles of the white power complex that controls this country

Eric Holder is seen above being sworn in to Protect the legal rights of our citizens.  On November 4, 2008 elections 3 Black Panthers were outside a voting poll with a weapon, swinging it and intimdating voters, mainly white voters or anyone who was not going to vote for President Obama.  They directly violated Fedreal Law of Voters Rights of the Voter Right Act. 

They were charged accordingly during the Bush administation.  Now yesterday a panal of 15 Democrates along with our Attorney General just dismissed this important case.  Thier were 14 Republican's against dropping this suit.  They asked for all documents pertaining to this Federal Violation.  They were dismissed again by Eric Holder and the 15 Democrates.  They were not allowed to even read the complaint. 

He is compelled to pursue legal action against all who violate Federal Law, especially when it comes down to having Black Panthers with weapons intimadating "We the People."

There were over 208 complaints filed with regards to voter intimidation and/or Voter fraud. 

These men stood at voting booths waving thier night sticks and it has been recorded which is in direct violation of Fedreal Law.  What does our Attorney General do? Drop the suit!!!!!!! 

Now lets compare this great decsion again our Democrates and Attorney General have made.  I once informed all that there are three branches of government.  Executive Branch, Legislative Branch, and Judical Branch.  When they sleep together there are no more checks and balances.  This has been shown throughout this Admistration.   

I would dare to say if the KKK stood outside a Voting Booth, or White Supremist Group,  they would be hauled off and the left wing news medial would make a spectial of this.  Not to mention they would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  There would be FBI, ATF, all gathering evidence against those who intimidated those who wanted to vote and broke Fedreal Law.

But our Attorney General dismisses this suit? He states by dismissing this important Federal Case that  it is ok to intimidate people as long as the vote goes thier way.  Don't worry you will not be prosecuted. 

This is what we have running our country.  I am not racist by any means.  But compare the two and come to your own conclusions.

We the People need to vote these people out of office and ensure midterm elections are held without intimidation.  YOU and only YOU can make a difference on how this country is going to be runned.  I feel ashamed that all this back door, shaking hand deals are going on right under our noses. WE THE PEOPLE need this to stop and your voice needs to be heard.

The Campaign Against Harry Reid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fimP4gufUxI

A Message from One US Senator who works for the people

Dear Friends,



Thank you to those of you who’ve signed my petition against the Democrats’ health care bill.



I am leading the Republican charge to open health care reform negotiations to public scrutiny and challenging Senate Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to allow C-SPAN to televise the closed-door negotiations going on between Senate and House Democrats and the White House.



During the presidential campaign in 2008 President Obama said of health care reform, “… we’ll have the negotiations televised on C-SPAN so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies.”



Yet, that is not what has happened. Instead, the Democrats are negotiating this 2,000 + page bill among themselves and locking Republicans and the American people out.



I’m working to change that. Read the letter my Republican colleagues and I sent to Senator Harry Reid.



Meanwhile, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has called into question the savings Democrats claim would result from their bill and has pointed out that health care costs under the bill will actually increase by more than $200 billion.



Of the purported “savings” in the bill, the report uses terms like “unrealistic”, “doubtful”, and “difficult to obtain,” as well as saying that the bill could lead to “price increases, cost-shifting, and/or changes in providers’ willingness to treat patients with low-reimbursement health coverage.”



That’s why I will continue to oppose the bill and will do all I can to see it defeated, along with all 39 of my Republican colleagues in the Senate.



If you want to know what you can do to help, in addition to contacting your elected representatives again, there’s only one additional thing I know of we can do: help deny the Democrats their 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.



One week from today Massachusetts will elect a new Senator in a special election. Like me, Republican State Senator Scott Brown vehemently opposes the Democrats’ health care legislation and will vote to stop it, work to send it back to the drawing board and try to enact real reform that will lower costs without spending trillions of dollars and raising billions in new taxes we can’t afford.



Please help us defeat this bill by visiting Scott Brown’s website and making an online donation to his campaign today. I have sent a contribution to him, and I hope you will consider doing the same.



The polls have shown the race in a dead heat. The Wall Street Journal says of him, “Mr. Brown … has been running against Washington’s blowout spending and has called for a freeze on the wages of federal employees.” And, “The mere fact that Democrats have to fight so hard to save Ted Kennedy’s seat shows how badly they have misjudged America by governing so far to the left.”



In an editorial the Boston Herald noted, “… if you’re not happy with the status quo, if you think the way business is being conducted on Capitol Hill today is a disgrace and an affront to taxpayers, then you probably agree it’s time for a change. Scott Brown can single-handedly deliver on that kind of change and the Herald is pleased to endorse his candidacy in the race for U.S. Senate.”



I couldn’t agree more, and I hope that you do also.



Thank you again for getting involved and helping us make a difference. I sincerely appreciate your interest and support.



Sincerely,







John Thune

U.S. Senator

Windfall Tax and Double Standards

By: Paul Quincy




Do you remember the windfall tax and how the democrat’s preached that extra wealth from the “bad rich oil guys” profits should be taken? Remember? On February 2, 2007 Hillary Clinton was calling for the 45.2 Billion profit the oil companies made should be taxed on that profit.



Obama on April 10, 2007, and his other socialist companions stated the same throughout the election process. All we kept hearing is those bad rich oil boys need to pay a windfall tax. They have been known to say people are suffering, we need to tax that windfall and spread it around.



Well to our surprise, the Federal Reserve made 52.1 Billion dollars. Not out of fuel but from the tax payers. But yet no one dares threaten the Feds. No complaints heard about their windfall. Double standards?



At least Exxon Mobile and other oil companies did their jobs, or the people who worked for them got paid for doing their job to pay for their mortgages, food, heat, clothes, etc.



What has the Feds done? Nothing but spend our money foolishly on programs that have been proven not to work. I don’t see Hillary or Obama taken windfall taxes from the Feds and spreading it around. Why? Because it effects them directly.



The Feds got us into this mess with home foreclosures in real estate. If you are AIG or Bank of America you did not escape this real estate bubble. Yes, there were bail outs, but not like Fannie and Freddie who the Feds just loved to bail out.



Charlie Reingald who has 50 employees in the Whitehouse along with Senator Dobbs and others do not pay taxes. Charlie Reingald owes 812, 917.00 in taxes. Were is the yelling and holding the feet to the fire on these guys? Robert Crumum another friend of Washington does not have to pay his taxes owed. Want to know why? Because it has been stated by Whitehouse he helps the poor.



We have become a nation of law not men. When this happens we are a doomed nation. Our forefathers fought hard for these corrupt, double standards not to happen. What do you think? Think hard, fast, and get these people out of office. We the People come first. When our leaders do not listen to the voice of the people we are a land of lost.

Do You Value Your Rights? Who is Paying?

By: Paul Quincy


Do you as an American value your rights? Well, in this transparent administration, the "first” to called and sworn to transparency is however, not. It seems to this blogger that our rights as Americans are being traded behind close doors of the White House. This is also confirmed by News and other new media and organization sources other than mine. One for example is the www.thenationalrightto work.com. This organization is headed by Mark Mix from the state of Virginia, which is a right to work state. You say what are you getting at? It is about the everyday deals made behind the close doors of “our transparent government” that promised you the world. In fact, what they promise is deception, corruption and unconstitutional . The deception continues and shows no signs of stopping soon. Which leads me to this first article on Health Care and Unions.


What day is Union day at the White house? Everyday is Union day at the Whitehouse. Not to mention all the deals being made about your health care among other things without your knowledge or ignoring our call as citizens of this once great county. Don't get me wrong, it still is the best country in the world but, not for long. Let me explain below on what I am trying to inform, warn and educate you on.


Pretend in your mind, a pie. Now out of that pie certain people are taxed by their wealth.

Now we are going to cut up that pie and try to show you in a step by step way to understand what the Whitehouse and Unions are doing about our health care.


The top 1% pay 40% of taxes out of that pie in taxes (bad rich people);

The top 2%-10% pay about 55% of taxes out of that pie;

The next 50% pay one eighth of taxes out of that pie;

The bottom people of that pie pay about 3% of taxes out of that pie.


Now Michele Obama was quoted as stating but put into a paraphrase that:

“ In order for more social programs and health care to be ascertained people would have to give up a piece of the pie.”


Well lets say the top 1% want to give their piece of pie to charity. Or any other pieces of that pie want to give it donate it to charity. It is a flat NO from the government,. Why you ask? First everyone has to have a piece of the pie even though it is not cut fairly and cannot sustain what the President and other far left are doing and because in order for them to continue on this path of spending they have to get funds to pay back those that were already spent. Your tax dollars. They the government wants your piece of the pie to pay for the social plans and health care that the government is shoving down our throats. CHARITY DOES NOT WORK NOR WILL BE EXCEPTED. Those who are going to pay more taxes are the “bad guys” the top 1% for this health care. But yes we all are going to pay more down the line one way or another. The system can not and will not work as the Democrat’s seem to think it is going to. They already proven they can’t even make pie at this point and divide equally so each one pays the same. It cant work the way President Obama wants you to believe it can. Deceit, Deception and Corruption is the game that is being played with our lives.

 The redistribution of wealth and progressives are shoving health care down the throats of all americans.  How are they going to deal with the poor? Not enough pie to go around ya know.  It is a lie they are feeding us.  That is why it is Union day is everyday at the Whitehouse.  To make deals behind close doors and to sleep with each other so We the People will be hit by corrupt unions and pay for for this health care bill while they are exempt from paying at all.  Fair? You decide.  John Sweeny who is a Union Leader, socialist has been quoted as stating "Take from the Rich and Give to the Poor." Meanwhile his union is not effected.  This is class warfare. 


  If you are a union you will be protected under this health care bill, even if your not working but still in the union.  If not you will be hit with 40% tax increase to pay.  Look at who most of those Union Leaders are.  They are democrates and secular progressives who want to make this country a social if not communist one. 


We have people who don’t want to be part of the pie. They have their own health care or are satisfied with what they have. But yet, the Whitehouse refuses along with “Prince Harry” and “Princess Pelosi” to listen to reason and the American people.

Now you ask what does the Unions have to do with this? Well there are 6 unions right now who have struck deals with their managers, Unions and Whitehouse to exempt them from the 40% tax YOU will have to pay on health care for them, those Cadillac plans we hear about. The Unions like GM who got into bed with the Feds is one example. Let me explain this one too.

Pretend and close your eyes and see a plate of doughnuts on the table. Those doughnuts represent cars.

Now for every car sold, the employees of those unions get 2 extra cars and the unions get one half of the two cars. Now we know this system cannot sustain itself since we already have seen the car companies asking for bail out money. But it continues to go on without anymore funds or cars available. Nothing, caput. Those working or not working for these companies but are retired are still getting those Cadillac health plans that run about 23,000 for a family of four. But guess what? They are exempt from paying the 40% tax due on the health care plan to all of us due to the back door deals made with this President. Unions date back to the Big Deal of the 1930’s. However, from 1930 to present the gap between separate enterprise and the everyday citizen remained left a a big gap between government in our lives. Every since the 1930 it has slowly progressed to the gap closing and now more government in our lives at this specific date and time. Were not even showing what is to come. When Unions get into bed to ensure government gave them the deals they want and exempt them from paying for their own health care and put the burden upon us we should be asking questions. Just like Thomas Jefferson did! He quoted “Ask questions boldly.” Now can you see who is paying for this ridiculous health care nightmare? WE THE PEOPLE. This is only one example of this ridiculous health care reform.

The government can’t even bake pies or doughnuts right as stated above. Do you trust them with your health and telling us, We the People what is good or bad for us? Don't allow this to continue, inform and educate and the most important thing is to vote these people out of office. 

WHEN OUR FORFATHERS CAME TOGETHER, THIER INTENTIONS WERE 3 BRANCHES OF OFFICE.  EXECUTIVE BRANCH, LEGISLATIVE BRANCH AND JUDICIAL BRANCH.  WHEN WE HAVE THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCH SLEEPING TOGETHER WE HAVE NO CHECKS AND BALANCES IN OUR SYSTEM.  THAT IS WHY HEALTH CARE IS BEING RAMMED DOWN OUR THROATS.  EACH BRANCH MUST SLEEP ALONE.   THIS IS NO MORE THAN HAVING A PREMIER, IN OTHER WORDS A DICTATORSHIP, NOT FREEDOM AND LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.