Fred Thompson About Obama's Financial Reform Bill

April 21, 2010


Audio - Fred Says: Flim-Flam Artistry



Fred's got a different name for Obama's financial reform bill [full audio clip here (running time 1:29)]:

I don't know how to describe this. Greatest flim-flam artistry that I have seen in a long, long time. I keep saying that, but they keep exceeding expectations in flim-flammery in this town. You have a financial reform bill, the President wants to cram this through, says he wants to get tough on Wall Street. Which is an absolute fraud and farce. The bill does NOT get tough on Wall Street. It's like jiu-jitsu, you use your enemy's strength to your advantage and his disadvantage.



They're claiming that the Republicans are trying to protect Wall Street, and they're really wanting to get tough on Wall Street. Why is it that Wall Street is FOR this thing? I mean, they're FOR what the President is trying to do, at the same time that they're showering the Democrats with money, and always have. They institutionalize "too big to fail", they give bureaucrats the authority for these companies to live or die - and I say companies loosely, because that's what it is, it's not just banks, it's any kind of a financial institution, it's anything related - and anyway it covers all manner of things. It gives them authority to regulate lending practices in this country. It sets up a whole new bureaucracy within the Federal Reserve System, for some reason, to do that.



So, they're trying to cram this down, they're trying to get another notch in their belt. They're trying to achieve another victory. They're trying to - while they're demonizing the Tea Partiers - they're trying to placate the Tea Partiers and the rest of America - who they hope doesn't pay much attention - by passing this financial reform bill.

Huckabee The battle for your life

United States Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens announced that he will retire this summer at the end of the Court’s current term. Because Justice Stevens was one of the more liberal members of the Court, he and I differ on most issues, but I do thank him for his service and wish him well.

President Obama and many Congressional Democrats have already begun floating names of potential replacements. In fact, many abortion advocates are already working to ensure President Obama nominates a person to the Supreme Court who is pro-choice.

News reports show Congressional Republicans promise a ‘whale of a fight’ if the President’s choice is too liberal – but sadly, I don’t believe Republican’s have the ability to stop an abortion advocate being appointed to the bench. My distrust is based on the track record and methods imposed by the Obama Administration, Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats.

In the face of strong and vocal Republican opposition:

• President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats refused to listen to the American people and rammed a hugely unpopular health care bill rammed down our throats;



• President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats excluded Republicans when writing the bill and then refused to compromise with Republican amendments;



• President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats twisted the financial impact of Obamacare to ensure its passage – saddling future generations with massive debt; and



• President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats openly mocked Americans who disagreed with them.



If President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats will employ these tactics with a clearly unpopular Healthcare bill that forces you and me to pay for abortions, they will for sure do the same with a Supreme Court nominee who advocates abortion.



What of the “pro-life Democrats”? Well . . . we saw how “principled” they were. A little pressure from the Administration and their principles went up in smoke. This “conservative” wing of the Democrat Party is non-existent. Based on the health care vote, it seems clear to me these Democrats value their jobs more than their principles.



Don’t forget what a hugely partisan battle we had when President George W. Bush had two vacancies on the Court during his two terms in office. In the face of stiff Democratic opposition, President George W. Bush nominated and confirmed two pro-life judges to the Supreme Court – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito. Like, love or hate President Bush’s presidency, he stood firm on his principles of life with those two nominations.



We had to fight the Democrats harder than ever with a Pro-life advocate in the White House. Imagine the fight ahead with the Obama Administration.



Folks, the battle for life begins now.



We must be prepared to fight hard to ensure that any nominee selected by President Obama believes in the sanctity of life.



I am hopeful that the President will select a person who is committed to deciding cases impartially based on the rule of law, not based on personal politics or preferences. I do expect Senate Republicans to make a sustained and vigorous case for judicial restraint – but we CANNOT rely on their efforts alone.



We must be engaged early. We have to begin the battle now if we are to have an impact.

I am counting on each of you to stand with me as we fight to ensure that the sanctity of life is respected and protected.



Will you make a donation of $5 or more to join our Pro-Life Action Team?



When the Senate confirmation fight begins, we will mobilize this team and grassroots volunteers nationwide to make calls and apply pressure. Our goal is to have 5,000 team members in place by the beginning of June to make calls.



Now is the time to prepare for this fight. We need these next few weeks to identify team members, organize a phone campaign to fight for Life in the Supreme Court. We will also use member donations to elect more congressional Republicans.



Let me be clear: Huck PAC only supports pro-Life Republicans.



Please help us fight for life. Join our Action Team today. Let’s make certain Democrats in the Senate know that we will only accept a pro-Life Justice.



Sincerely,







Mike Huckabee

Get The Facts on HC, Taxes they are going to empose Obama

Get the Facts Before You Speak;Taxes, HC, FCC

The Mistake, Evidence Obama is not constitional president

The Mistake, The Evidence, Obama is NOT a constitutional president

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie

By J.B. Williams

September 10, 2009

See: The Theory is Now a ConspiracyÑI
See: The Theory is Now a Conspiracy -- III -Please read update at bottom of article
Though we live in an era when all undesirable facts are often blindly labeled "conspiracy theories" by political operatives with an agenda at risk, a very real conspiracy unfolds every now and then.
While it is indeed true that not all theories are actual conspiracies, like when Hillary Clinton developed an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy" out to get her husband, when in fact, the semen stained dress provided all the necessary (but unfriendly) facts and a perfectly logical explanation for all of those nasty rumors Ð it is also true that some conspiracies are much more than just crackpot theory.
To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a "conspiracy." Not in theory, but in reality.
Such is the case today!
A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many Ð many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.
They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too...
They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, "drive-by media" caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.
But as is always the case with liars, cheats and thieves, they slip up Ð make a silly mistake Ð overplay their hand Ð leave evidence lying around that they had forgotten about. And as with all chronic liars, they eventually get caught in their own web of lies.
Then, one day, someone stumbles into that evidence, and the house of cards comes crashing down around them. It's almost poetic...

The Mistake

Aware of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II Ð Section I constitutional requirements for the office of President, what well-seasoned professional politician would be stupid enough to sign their name and stake their personal career upon certifying Obama as eligible?
Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates are nominated at their respective Party Conventions.
Believe it or not, each Party is assigned the duty of vetting and certifying the legal eligibility of their own candidates. I know, like asking the fox to guard the henhouse, right. But hey, we are talking about a country which still thinks there is a separation of powers between the High Court and the Executive branch, which seats that court by way of political appointment, confirmed by congress, which wants a piece of the judge and expects a few political favors too.

The Evidence

In this case, the Democrat Party was responsible for vetting and certifying Barack Hussein Obama as legally eligible to seek the Oval Office. The U.S. Constitution has only three very specific requirements for the job. The proper legal text used on the DNC Party "Official Certification of Nomination" document reads as follows, and I quote;

"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

Obama assinations

Assination by Obama

Change we may be getting Thanks Obama

http://obxsun.com/Change-We-May-Be-Getting.php

Finally the Truth about Obama not being a real citizen

The Mistake, The Evidence, Obama is NOT a constitutional president

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie

By J.B. Williams

September 10, 2009

See: The Theory is Now a ConspiracyÑI
See: The Theory is Now a Conspiracy -- III -Please read update at bottom of article
Though we live in an era when all undesirable facts are often blindly labeled "conspiracy theories" by political operatives with an agenda at risk, a very real conspiracy unfolds every now and then.
While it is indeed true that not all theories are actual conspiracies, like when Hillary Clinton developed an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy" out to get her husband, when in fact, the semen stained dress provided all the necessary (but unfriendly) facts and a perfectly logical explanation for all of those nasty rumors Ð it is also true that some conspiracies are much more than just crackpot theory.
To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a "conspiracy." Not in theory, but in reality.
Such is the case today!
A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many Ð many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.
They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too...
They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, "drive-by media" caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.
But as is always the case with liars, cheats and thieves, they slip up Ð make a silly mistake Ð overplay their hand Ð leave evidence lying around that they had forgotten about. And as with all chronic liars, they eventually get caught in their own web of lies.
Then, one day, someone stumbles into that evidence, and the house of cards comes crashing down around them. It's almost poetic...

The Mistake

Aware of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II Ð Section I constitutional requirements for the office of President, what well-seasoned professional politician would be stupid enough to sign their name and stake their personal career upon certifying Obama as eligible?
Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates are nominated at their respective Party Conventions.
Believe it or not, each Party is assigned the duty of vetting and certifying the legal eligibility of their own candidates. I know, like asking the fox to guard the henhouse, right. But hey, we are talking about a country which still thinks there is a separation of powers between the High Court and the Executive branch, which seats that court by way of political appointment, confirmed by congress, which wants a piece of the judge and expects a few political favors too.

The Evidence

In this case, the Democrat Party was responsible for vetting and certifying Barack Hussein Obama as legally eligible to seek the Oval Office. The U.S. Constitution has only three very specific requirements for the job. The proper legal text used on the DNC Party "Official Certification of Nomination" document reads as follows, and I quote;

"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."